[kubuntu-devel] Re: [kubuntu-devel] Re: Re: KDevelop and upstream frustration
afiestas at kde.org
Thu Nov 29 10:53:13 UTC 2012
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 10:55:20 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 04:29:51 PM Aleix Pol wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 November 2012 14:46:26 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > > > So why isn't KDevelop included in KDE? or by KDE here you only mean
> > > > the
> > > > KDE SC?
> > >
> > > Yes it's KDE SC, the exception decision was made before the rebranding
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > And can't we use this ambiguity in our favor?
> > I don't think I should push for any of that in any case... What I wanted
> > to
> > do with this thread is to find solutions, not explanations about the rules
> > that drove us in such a crazy place...
> No. It was very clearly discussed to be what we now call KDE SC (KDE
> support is specifically excluded, for example). As long as someone is
> willing to commit to make the packages and there's an upstream commitment
> to limit point release changes to bug fixes and not new features, it should
> be easy to get KDevelop added.
> I'm willing to go to the tech board and ask for an exception for KDevelop as
> long as someone is willing to do the packages (I don't use it regularly, so
> I really couldn't test it, so I'm not the right person for that.)
We have done minor releases of BlueDevil, and it is not in KDE SC... :/
More information about the kubuntu-devel