R: Re: ubuntuone

[James Cain]

Thank you, Luca. I (and all other Kubuntu faithful) look forward to your
efforts! I'm sure you're familiar with Harald Sitter's efforts last year...
http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/ubuntu-one-the-kde-way/

Again, best of luck with this project.

- James




On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, LucaTringali <TRINGALINVENT at libero.it>wrote:

> Without doing a religion war, I just wanted to say that I'm gonna spend
> some
> time on this project in the future months.
> I think we can stop the discussion here, we are going off topic.
>
> Luca Tringali
>
> >----Messaggio originale----
> >Da: giupenni78 at gmail.com
> >Data: 12/04/2011 23.20
> >A: "Kubuntu Developer Discussion"<kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> >Ogg: Re: R: Re: ubuntuone
> >
> >2011/4/12 Ralph Janke <txwikinger at ubuntu.com>:
> >>  On 04/12/2011 03:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----Messaggio originale----
> >>>>> Da: macoafi at gmail.com
> >>>>> Data: 12/04/2011 20.03
> >>>>> A: "LucaTringali"<TRINGALINVENT at libero.it>, "Kubuntu Developer
> >>>>> Discussion"
> >>>>
> >>>> <kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ogg: Re: ubuntuone
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, LucaTringali<
> TRINGALINVENT at libero.it>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello everybody,
> >>>>>> I just wanted to know what's the status of ubuntuone-kde client... I
> >>>>>> wasn't
> >>>>>> able to find a working version: no deb packages, no sources. How is
> its
> >>>>>> development going?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don't believe anyone's picked it back up since GSoC ended last year.
> >>>>> Do you want to?
> >>>>>
> >>>> I could try to make it work, but I have not too much time, so I may
> need
> >>>> some
> >>>> months to release something usable.
> >>>>
> >>> No one else is working on it at all as far as I know, so even if you
> can
> >>> only make slow progress, that would be considerable improvement over
> where
> >>> we are now.
> >>>
> >>> Scott K
> >>>
> >> I think the biggest issue was, remembering the UDS discussion about this
> >> topic that UbuntuOne was not very cooperative with (pre-)warnings of API
> >> changes. This always puts a potential KDE version in the disadvantage of
> >> being behind the 8-ball.
> >>
> >> I am not sure if there is a realistic chance to create a KDE version
> under
> >> these circumstances, interestingly, the UbuntuOne project within
> Canonical
> >> does seem to do the same here that Mark is criticising Gnome for.
> >>
> >> This is unfortunate, however, I do not see currently a solution for
> this.
> >>
> >Ubuntu ONE or not the question is simple,
> >Ubuntu is the only Canonical project to make a very useful and lovely
> >distro for our desktop and all their effort are focused in it.
> >Kubuntu is only a "hobby" of a pair guys that will never the same
> >attention as Ubuntu.
> >The result is that all Canonical projects are only Gnome oriented.
> >No one o very few (just a pair) Canonical developers will work in the
> >distro to cure details for improve it. The Kubuntu destiny is only in
> >the hands of KDE...also for the default settings.
> >
> >I always thank the Kubuntu developers but I think this is the fact.
> >
> >Just my two cents,
> >
> >Giuseppe
> >
> >--
> >kubuntu-devel mailing list
> >kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> >Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.
> com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20110412/1d4bd57f/attachment-0001.html>