R: Re: R: Re: ubuntuone

LucaTringali TRINGALINVENT at libero.it
Tue Apr 12 21:26:33 UTC 2011

Without doing a religion war, I just wanted to say that I'm gonna spend some 
time on this project in the future months. 
I think we can stop the discussion here, we are going off topic.

Luca Tringali

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: giupenni78 at gmail.com
>Data: 12/04/2011 23.20
>A: "Kubuntu Developer Discussion"<kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: ubuntuone
>2011/4/12 Ralph Janke <txwikinger at ubuntu.com>:
>>  On 04/12/2011 03:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>>>> ----Messaggio originale----
>>>>> Da: macoafi at gmail.com
>>>>> Data: 12/04/2011 20.03
>>>>> A: "LucaTringali"<TRINGALINVENT at libero.it>, "Kubuntu Developer
>>>>> Discussion"
>>>> <kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>>> Ogg: Re: ubuntuone
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, LucaTringali<TRINGALINVENT at libero.it>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>>> I just wanted to know what's the status of ubuntuone-kde client... I
>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>> able to find a working version: no deb packages, no sources. How is its
>>>>>> development going?
>>>>> Don't believe anyone's picked it back up since GSoC ended last year.
>>>>> Do you want to?
>>>> I could try to make it work, but I have not too much time, so I may need
>>>> some
>>>> months to release something usable.
>>> No one else is working on it at all as far as I know, so even if you can
>>> only make slow progress, that would be considerable improvement over where
>>> we are now.
>>> Scott K
>> I think the biggest issue was, remembering the UDS discussion about this
>> topic that UbuntuOne was not very cooperative with (pre-)warnings of API
>> changes. This always puts a potential KDE version in the disadvantage of
>> being behind the 8-ball.
>> I am not sure if there is a realistic chance to create a KDE version under
>> these circumstances, interestingly, the UbuntuOne project within Canonical
>> does seem to do the same here that Mark is criticising Gnome for.
>> This is unfortunate, however, I do not see currently a solution for this.
>Ubuntu ONE or not the question is simple,
>Ubuntu is the only Canonical project to make a very useful and lovely
>distro for our desktop and all their effort are focused in it.
>Kubuntu is only a "hobby" of a pair guys that will never the same
>attention as Ubuntu.
>The result is that all Canonical projects are only Gnome oriented.
>No one o very few (just a pair) Canonical developers will work in the
>distro to cure details for improve it. The Kubuntu destiny is only in
>the hands of KDE...also for the default settings.
>I always thank the Kubuntu developers but I think this is the fact.
>Just my two cents,
>kubuntu-devel mailing list
>kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.

More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list