Q: Why does Kubuntu exist?

[Nathan Bailey]

P.S.  I do like Yuriy's list.  Sort of the defining standard for any
desktop/OS combination.

Nathan

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com>wrote:

> Hullos!
>
> In my recent wave of thinking about Kubuntu and how to make it clearer what
> exactly we are doing, I came to wonder why Kubuntu actually exists.
>
> Now, let me explain what I mean by that. Every project (every useful one
> anyway) is there to solve some problem or improve something, simply put a
> general justification for spending time on it. Kubuntu, being a useful
> project,
> must have some general justificaiton of existance, some problem, desire or
> similar.
>
> What I'd like to find out is exactly what Kubuntu is supposed to archive,
> and
> why other OS or distributions failed at it. Not so much by how we want to
> archive it or by what means we (want to) measure the successfulness of
> this.
>
> If everyone writes a couple of lines (some would call this brainstorming
> ;)),
> it might be easier to find a general definition as to why Kubuntu is
> existing
> and why it is good that it is existing.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Harald Sitter
> Kubuntu Core Developer
> http://www.kubuntu.org
>
> --
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20091210/f664afa8/attachment.htm