APPLIED Re: [SRU focal:linux-oem-5.6 focal:linux-oem-5.10] LP#1905013 -- express oem flavour explicitly V2

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 20.11.2020 15.39, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> All kernels have an intrisic flavour (generic, lowlatency, aws, oem etc).
> These are normally expressed in the binary package names from the
> primary package, and reflected into the meta packages names produced by
> linux-meta and linux-restricted-modules.  The flavours are further
> qualified via the variants system.
> 
> For the linux-oem-{5.6,5.10} packages the intrisic flavour is missing
> and is supplied via the variant.  This is wrong as we could never have
> a second flavour in this package.  This is incompatible with generating
> the package from the flavour names, as it does not have an intrinsic
> flavour.  Express the oem flavour explcitly for these packages.
> 
> There are three sets of patches.  The first patch is for
> kernel-series.yaml and corrects the variants there.  The next two
> patches are for linux-meta-oem-5.6 and linux-restricted-modules-5.10,
> and the final two are for linux-meta-oem-5.10 and linux-meta-oem-5.10.
> 
> I have compared the debian/control files before and after these updates
> and they are identicle.
> 
> It should be safe to apply the variants update to kteam-tools as soon as
> the remainder of the patches have been applied to the various branches,
> they do not need to be uploaded.
> 
> -apw

Makes sense, applied the meta/lrm changes.



-- 
t