APPLIED Re: [SRU focal:linux-oem-5.6 focal:linux-oem-5.10] LP#1905013 -- express oem flavour explicitly V2

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 23.11.2020 10.52, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 20.11.2020 15.39, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> All kernels have an intrisic flavour (generic, lowlatency, aws, oem etc).
>> These are normally expressed in the binary package names from the
>> primary package, and reflected into the meta packages names produced by
>> linux-meta and linux-restricted-modules.  The flavours are further
>> qualified via the variants system.
>>
>> For the linux-oem-{5.6,5.10} packages the intrisic flavour is missing
>> and is supplied via the variant.  This is wrong as we could never have
>> a second flavour in this package.  This is incompatible with generating
>> the package from the flavour names, as it does not have an intrinsic
>> flavour.  Express the oem flavour explcitly for these packages.
>>
>> There are three sets of patches.  The first patch is for
>> kernel-series.yaml and corrects the variants there.  The next two
>> patches are for linux-meta-oem-5.6 and linux-restricted-modules-5.10,
>> and the final two are for linux-meta-oem-5.10 and linux-meta-oem-5.10.
>>
>> I have compared the debian/control files before and after these updates
>> and they are identicle.
>>
>> It should be safe to apply the variants update to kteam-tools as soon as
>> the remainder of the patches have been applied to the various branches,
>> they do not need to be uploaded.
>>
>> -apw
> 
> Makes sense, applied the meta/lrm changes.

and now kteam-tools as well, with buglink added


-- 
t