Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

[Tim Penhey]

On 12/06/16 21:00, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>  From an upgrade point of view, I would focus on the migration
> capability, because that provides the cleanest semantics. If we have
> everything we need there and upgrades happen to work from b9 onwards,
> then that's great, but please communicate that I will not hesitate to
> make breaking changes until we are in RC if that's the right thing to do
> for 2.0. I'll call the RC when I think the experience is crisp - we have
> made huge strides in the pat weeks in that regard, let's not slow down now.

Unfortunately, migrations is a piece of work that isn't yet ready. We 
are working on it, but it won't be ready for a number of weeks yet.

Tim