[ACTION REQUIRED] Shall 1.11.3 be retagged as 1.12 ?
David Cheney
david.cheney at canonical.com
Wed Jul 24 00:18:03 UTC 2013
As of 24/July I get the feeling that 1.11.4 might be a better tag to
branch from.
Can I get two LGTM's for this proposal please.
Cheers
Dave
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
> Dave
>
> I've just confirmed it's broken on Openstack in general if --upload-tools is not
> used. The reason is that if existing tools are used, a SetConfig() call is made
> to update the agent version and this resets any current Openstack authentication
> credentials held by juju. This didn't matter previously but does now. There's no
> need for the credentials to be reset but SetConfig() is a sledgehammer in that
> it resets everything when called, even if it doesn't have to.
>
> I've got a 3 line (4 with "if err != nil return") fix. I'll talk to you about
> getting a 1.11.3.1 release out (or whatever we decide to do).
>
> There's another issue on HP Cloud - once I fixed the above issue, it's having an
> issue finding the image id in the current simplestreams metadata. I'm looking
> into that also, but that's not likely to be a software issue.
>
> On 23/07/13 09:53, David Cheney wrote:
>> I have heard anecdotal evidence that 1.11.3 does not work on HP Cloud.
>> Can anyone confirm or deny this please.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, David Cheney
>> <david.cheney at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 1.11.3 was released today. Is it a sufficient release candidate that
>>> it be the basis for a 1.12 stable branch ?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list