[ACTION REQUIRED] Shall 1.11.3 be retagged as 1.12 ?

Tim Penhey tim.penhey at canonical.com
Wed Jul 24 00:35:16 UTC 2013


On 24/07/13 12:18, David Cheney wrote:
> As of 24/July I get the feeling that 1.11.4 might be a better tag to
> branch from.
> 
> Can I get two LGTM's for this proposal please.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dave

I agree

> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Dave
>>
>> I've just confirmed it's broken on Openstack in general if --upload-tools is not
>> used. The reason is that if existing tools are used, a SetConfig() call is made
>> to update the agent version and this resets any current Openstack authentication
>> credentials held by juju. This didn't matter previously but does now. There's no
>> need for the credentials to be reset but SetConfig() is a sledgehammer in that
>> it resets everything when called, even if it doesn't have to.
>>
>> I've got a 3 line (4 with "if err != nil return") fix. I'll talk to you about
>> getting a 1.11.3.1 release out (or whatever we decide to do).
>>
>> There's another issue on HP Cloud - once I fixed the above issue, it's having an
>> issue finding the image id in the current simplestreams metadata. I'm looking
>> into that also, but that's not likely to be a software issue.
>>
>> On 23/07/13 09:53, David Cheney wrote:
>>> I have heard anecdotal evidence that 1.11.3 does not work on HP Cloud.
>>> Can anyone confirm or deny this please.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, David Cheney
>>> <david.cheney at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> 1.11.3 was released today. Is it a sufficient release candidate that
>>>> it be the basis for a 1.12 stable branch ?
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>
> 




More information about the Juju-dev mailing list