Please re-instate me as a direct member of ~motu

[Thomas Ward]

I would say the question is, if you have superseding CoreDev (which you do) then why do you *need* MOTU?  There's no extra benefits to MOTU if you are a Core Dev.



Sent from my Galaxy



-------- Original message --------
From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128 at ubuntu.com>
Date: 12/11/23 16:36 (GMT-05:00)
To: Simon Quigley <simon at tsimonq2.net>, devel-permissions at lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Please re-instate me as a direct member of ~motu

Hey Simon,

I've no problem having you added directly to the motu team but it does
raise the question of consistency. Checking the ~motu members I see some
coredev directly listed, including DMB members like Łukasz and Robie so
I do wonder if there is any standard practice there ... do other DMB
members have some input on the topic?

Cheers,
Sébastien Bacher

Le 11/12/2023 à 15:11, Simon Quigley a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> It seems that at some point over the years, my direct membership in
> ~motu expired. Being a Core Developer, I already am an *indirect*
> member of this team, but it would mean a lot to me to be re-added as a
> direct member.
>
> In case you'd like to re-read my already-approved MOTU application I
> wrote as a 15-year-old...
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/tsimonq2/Applications/MOTU
>
> Best regards,
>

--
Devel-permissions mailing list
Devel-permissions at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20231211/c89c63cc/attachment-0001.html>