Define a package-set for Ubuntu Budgie

[Mark Shuttleworth]

As a data point, let's encourage and nurture Ubuntu Budgie, they are an
exciting addition to the desktop space. DMB and TB carry responsibility
for making sure we keep the archive and developer community healthy, so
I'm not writing to change policy or override anything, only to say the
Budgie work is very welcome and it would be good to find a safe way to
empower the people driving it to do so in Ubuntu.

Mark

On 04/04/17 12:29, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:23:57PM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
>> This cause a lot of confusion and DMB have redirected me back to the TB.
> We did? This doesn't match my understanding. Please can you tell us what
> gave you this impression? Usually the DMB decides and defines
> packagesets, not the TB.
>
> Since I'm pretty sure the TB doesn't expect to have any involvement in
> this, I'm moving this thread back to the devel-permissions@ list, with
> the TB in Bcc only.
>
>> Please can a packageset be officially defined for Ubuntu Budgie?
> We (the DMB) deferred defining a packageset because packagesets are only
> used for access control, and we currently don't have anyone approved to
> be in that access control list anyway. So it shouldn't make any
> difference whether a packageset is defined right now or not.
>
> Have I missed something? Is there any other reason you need a packageset
> defined right now?
>
> Robie
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20170404/75fd4a5e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20170404/75fd4a5e/attachment.pgp>