fgallaire at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 04:05:21 UTC 2017
Thank for your answer Jelmer,
So Bazaar is dead, no more Canonical efforts so probably no more Bazaar release.
Let's go Breezy !
Could you merge this branch ?
2017-11-22 23:07 GMT+01:00 Jelmer Vernooĳ <jelmer at jelmer.uk>:
> Hi Florent,
> See our original announcement: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2017q2/076170.html
> Breezy is a friendly fork of Bazaar. Canonical is not involved in
> Breezy and there is no CLA.
> We forked because we wanted to make a number of big changes that would
> have been hard to make inside of an established project like Bazaar.
> (see the announcement for details)
> I don't know what GNU or Canonical's plans for Bazaar are, and
> whether a 2.8 is going to be released.
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:31:25AM +0100, Florent Gallaire wrote:
>> Why a new name for the same sofware (same CLI, same disk format) ? Why
>> not just a big number incrementation ? Don't you think Bazaar 3.0 with
>> Python 3 support was a good fit ?
>> There is a different project on Launchpad, so bugs are duplicated and
>> so it's really hard to follow the dev in the already clunky Launchpad.
>> The actual Bazaar milestone is 2.8b1, will Bazaar 2.8 be released ?
>> Is the CLA problem remaining in Breezy or not ?
>> Is Canonical (which is mainly using Git now ?) still involved in the
>> Bazaar/Breezy development ? i.e. are you paid by Canonical to work on
>> it ?
>> I still have a branch waiting to be merged in Bazaar (a Vincent's
>> promess) and Breezy (??)
>> FLOSS Engineer & Lawyer
> Jelmer Vernooĳ <jelmer at jelmer.uk>
> PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc
FLOSS Engineer & Lawyer
More information about the bazaar