Some questions

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Hi Florent,

See our original announcement: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2017q2/076170.html

Breezy is a friendly fork of Bazaar. Canonical is not involved in
Breezy and there is no CLA.

We forked because we wanted to make a number of big changes that would
have been hard to make inside of an established project like Bazaar.
(see the announcement for details)

I don't know what GNU or Canonical's plans for Bazaar are, and
whether a 2.8 is going to be released.

Jelmer

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:31:25AM +0100, Florent Gallaire wrote:
> Why a new name for the same sofware (same CLI, same disk format) ? Why
> not just a big number incrementation ? Don't you think Bazaar 3.0 with
> Python 3 support was a good fit ?
> 
> There is a different project on Launchpad, so bugs are duplicated and
> so it's really hard to follow the dev in the already clunky Launchpad.
> 
> The actual Bazaar milestone is 2.8b1, will Bazaar 2.8 be released ?
> 
> Is the CLA problem remaining in Breezy or not ?
> 
> Is Canonical (which is mainly using Git now ?) still involved in the
> Bazaar/Breezy development ? i.e. are you paid by Canonical to work on
> it ?
> 
> I still have a branch waiting to be merged in Bazaar (a Vincent's
> promess) and Breezy (??)
> https://code.launchpad.net/~fgallaire/bzr/fix-localtime
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> FLOSS Engineer & Lawyer
> 

-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at jelmer.uk>
PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20171122/ec8ea518/attachment.sig>