revision id format stability?

[Chris Hecker]

Is the email/whoami used for anything (like, uh, sending mail)?

Chris




On 2013-01-09 22:43, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-01-10 10:31, Chris Hecker wrote:
>>
>> How stable is the revision id format?  I'd like to include it in a
>> version resource, but I don't want my email in there, so I want to
>> stomp the domain name part in a script, but if the email or domain
>> has dashes in it...etc.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>
> We generate the revision id from your 'whoami'. I don't expect we'll
> change how we generate them any time soon.
>
> If you squish part of the revision-id out, then you'll have to use
> your own mechanism for bringing it back. One option is to just change
> your whoami if you really don't want your email address in the system.
>
> John
> =:->
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDuYxkACgkQJdeBCYSNAAP6FACgo4HGZTZtMFj9/jARNZagb9Zd
> LFQAn2PQTOGkjYyXiNRw0C1tk+NvHTCJ
> =nRlT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>