[ANN] bzr-2.5b3 has gone gold !

[John Meinel]

We wouldn't overwrite something in site-packages. That is where users put
their stuff. It should be in lib.

John
=:->
On Dec 1, 2011 6:58 AM, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: martin.packman at canonical.com (Martin Packman)
> > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:54:58 +0000
> >
> > Windows installers are now available at the same location.
> >
> > New in the windows packaging for 2.5b3:
> >
> > * bzr-explorer updated to trunk
> > * qbzr updated to trunk, fixes <http://pad.lv/872616>
> > * bzr-git added at version 0.6.5
> > * dulwich added at version 0.8.1
>
> Where does the installer put dulwich?  And does the dulwich which
> comes with the installer include the 3 *.pyd files compiled from *.c
> in the dulwich distro?
>
> I'm asking because after installing beta3, it looks like the files in
> the site-packages/dulwich directory were left as I put them there:
> they have the time stamp of when I installed the latest dulwich and
> compiled the *.c files myself.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20111201/0c95c26b/attachment.html>