[bazaar] [ANN] bzr-2.5b3 has gone gold !

[John Meinel]

> Right, the problem is that not all packagers seem to be subscribed to
> bzr-packagers[1] and that the common understanding is that 'going gold' is
> clearly intended to apply to the source release.
>
> Would '[ANN] bzr-2.5b3 source has gone gold !' be clearer in that
> respect ?
>
> I'm open to any change we can make to the release process to make things
> clearer and smoother nevertheless.
>
>        Vincent
>
> [1]: And to be honest, I only recently took the habit of including them
>     in the mail recipients.
>

As a clear example *I* was not subscribed to bzr-packagers before this
email.

I don't know if Jonathan realizes that we send the gold announcement to
only bzr-dev, while the final announce goes to bzr-announce. We didn't feel
we needed yet another tier. I suppose we could.

Bzr-dev is also a bzr "users" list, though. So I can appreciate the
thought. I'm not sure if it is worth the effort and overhead, but we can
discuss it.

John
=:->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20111110/24779d64/attachment.html>