annotate -rNNN for a removed file

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ben Finney <ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au>
> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:34:38 +1100
> 
> Andrew King <eurokang at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > By the way, can anyone explain what is the reasoning behind this bug
> > only having a "medium" priority level. It is pretty fundamental to a
> > version control system to be able to do this isn't it?
> 
> The capability is there; the Bazaar Explorer method to access it
> demonstrates that. So this is, apparently, a mismatch between Bazaar's
> functionality and Bazaar's UI. One with a workaround, as discussed
> earlier in this thread.
> 
> That seems sufficient justification to me for this bug to be prioritised
> below, say, bugs that destroy data, or essential capabilities that are
> missing.

I'll grant you that, but the fact is no one seems to work on this bug,
and there's no ETA.  For a medium priority bug that was filed almost a
year ago and confirmed 2 days later, that sounds like "medium" is not
interpreted quite literally, doesn't it?