Repository problems after bzr svn-import, ghost revisions

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 15:24 +0100, Anteru wrote:
> > Yeah, but I submit that bzr-svn either shouldn't leave the branch in
> > that sort of state (with inconsistent parents), or 'bzr check' should
> > be modified not to complain about it.  It's off-putting from a user
> > perspective, and it makes it hard for us to have an automated script
> > that checks the health of the branches.
> 
> It's even worse, because the casual user will do bzr svn-import, get ghost 
> revisions, see that diff does no longer work, and move on to another tool. I 
> hope that it can be sorted out somehow, but I'm pretty sure that I'm willing 
> to spend much more time/effort on this than the average joe; mostly because 
> I had good experience with bzr and I _really_ want to use it.
FWIW a patch to fix the diff bug has landed in bzr.dev, hopefully it'll
make it into 2.1.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100123/13edbca2/attachment.pgp