branch --bind or branch --bound?

[Michael Gliwinski]

On Tuesday 12 January 2010 01:32:47 David Muir wrote:
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Matthew D. Fuller writes:
> >  > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
> >  >
> >  > Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
> >  > > * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
> >  > > * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
> >  >
> >  > I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
> >  > action.
> >
> > +1
>
> --bound makes more sense IMO because we already have --stacked, and
> --standalone.
>
> David

Probably too late anyways but...

I agree you're asing for an action, but 'branch' is the word asking for that 
action (create a branch), '--bound' specifies what kind of branch.  '--bind' 
doesn't fit well (suppose '--and-bind' would make more sense but is a bit too 
much ;))

-- 
Michael Gliwinski
Henderson Group Information Services
9-11 Hightown Avenue, Newtownabby, BT36 4RT
Phone: 028 9034 3319

**********************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee and access to the email by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed  in the governing client engagement leter or contract.
If you have received this email in error please notify support at henderson-group.com

John Henderson (Holdings) Ltd
Registered office: 9 Hightown Avenue, Mallusk, County Antrim, Northern Ireland, BT36 4RT.
Registered in Northern Ireland
Registration Number NI010588
Vat No.: 814 6399 12
*********************************************************************************