branch --bind or branch --bound?
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Thu Jan 14 16:38:16 GMT 2010
Michael Gliwinski пишет:
> On Tuesday 12 January 2010 01:32:47 David Muir wrote:
>> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>> Matthew D. Fuller writes:
>>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
>>> >
>>> > Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
>>> > > * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
>>> > > * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
>>> >
>>> > I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
>>> > action.
>>>
>>> +1
>> --bound makes more sense IMO because we already have --stacked, and
>> --standalone.
>>
>> David
>
> Probably too late anyways but...
>
> I agree you're asing for an action, but 'branch' is the word asking for that
> action (create a branch), '--bound' specifies what kind of branch. '--bind'
> doesn't fit well (suppose '--and-bind' would make more sense but is a bit too
> much ;))
>
C:\>bzr branch --usage
Purpose: Create a new branch that is a copy of an existing branch.
Usage: bzr branch FROM_LOCATION [TO_LOCATION]
Options:
--use-existing-dir By default branch will fail if the target directory
exists, but does not already have a control
directory.
This flag will allow branch to proceed.
--stacked Create a stacked branch referring to the source
branch. The new branch will depend on the
availability
of the source branch for all operations.
-v, --verbose Display more information.
--standalone Do not use a shared repository, even if available.
-h, --help Show help message.
-q, --quiet Only display errors and warnings.
--switch Switch the checkout in the current directory to the
new branch.
--hardlink Hard-link working tree files where possible.
--usage Show usage message and options.
--no-tree Create a branch without a working-tree.
-r ARG, --revision=ARG
See "help revisionspec" for details.
There is also --switch and --hardlink. For any taste.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list