branch --bind or branch --bound?

[David Muir]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Matthew D. Fuller writes:
>  > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
>  > Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
>  > > 
>  > > * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
>  > > * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
>  > 
>  > I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
>  > action.
>
> +1
>
>   
--bound makes more sense IMO because we already have --stacked, and 
--standalone.

David