branch --bind or branch --bound?
Matthew D. Fuller
fullermd at over-yonder.net
Mon Jan 11 23:39:59 GMT 2010
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
> * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
action.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list