branch --bind or branch --bound?

Matthew D. Fuller fullermd at over-yonder.net
Mon Jan 11 23:39:59 GMT 2010


On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
> * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?

I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
action.


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.



More information about the bazaar mailing list