branch --bind or branch --bound?

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Matthew D. Fuller writes:
 > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:37:23PM +1000 I heard the voice of
 > Ian Clatworthy, and lo! it spake thus:
 > > 
 > > * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
 > > * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
 > 
 > I vote for --bind because it's a verb, and you're asking for an
 > action.

+1