branch --bind or branch --bound?

[Dennis Benzinger]

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:37:23 +1000
> Von: Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at canonical.com>
> An: Bazaar <bazaar at lists.canonical.com>
> Betreff: branch --bind or branch --bound?

> Eli suggested my proposed --bind option for branch be called --bound
> instead. I don't mind either way. What would new users expect the option
> to be called?
> 
> Is it:
> 
> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
> * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
> 
> I don't want to bikeshed on this but I'll give it 18-24 hours before
> making a call.
> 
> Ian C.

I'd prefer --bind because the option is like a second command and there's
already a command with that name.


Regards,
Dennis Benzinger