branch --bind or branch --bound?

[John Szakmeister]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
[snip]
>> Is it:
>>
>> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
>
> As non-English man I'd like to have --bind, because it's simpler to remember
> and there is such command.

I vote for --bind as well.

-John