branch --bind or branch --bound?

[Alexander Belchenko]

Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> Eli suggested my proposed --bind option for branch be called --bound
> instead. I don't mind either way. What would new users expect the option
> to be called?
> 
> Is it:
> 
> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or

As non-English man I'd like to have --bind, because it's simpler to 
remember and there is such command.


> * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
> 
> I don't want to bikeshed on this but I'll give it 18-24 hours before
> making a call.
> 
> Ian C.
> 
>