branch --bind or branch --bound?
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Mon Jan 11 08:35:15 GMT 2010
Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> Eli suggested my proposed --bind option for branch be called --bound
> instead. I don't mind either way. What would new users expect the option
> to be called?
>
> Is it:
>
> * --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
As non-English man I'd like to have --bind, because it's simpler to
remember and there is such command.
> * --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
>
> I don't want to bikeshed on this but I'll give it 18-24 hours before
> making a call.
>
> Ian C.
>
>
More information about the bazaar
mailing list