bzr-pipeline, installers and explorer
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Fri Nov 20 07:08:04 GMT 2009
Ian Clatworthy writes:
> At last week's sprint, I finally had a chance to get my head around
> Aaron's bzr-pipeline plugin. It's *seriously* useful stuff
So are looms. I don't think it's a good idea to push pipelines
without considering whether looms are going to be added.
I just spent a couple days fighting with Mercurial queues. The work
got done faster with queues than without them, but it would have
gotten done *much* faster in plain ol' git (with colocated branches
but no StGit or quilt). I think for the particular task, looms are
closer to what I would want in Bazaar.
I don't think that in the long run it's a great idea to have two very
similar UIs with different underlying representations and separate
command sets. So I advise considering pipelines and looms at the same
time so that unnecessary complexity is not added to the UI, even if
the underlying mechanisms can't be unified.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list