most authoritative branch for bzr dev?

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
> I think we should point first to lp.  It may be faster because it has a
> smart server, though at the moment only over ssh.
> 

So the biggest headache we've had with this situation is that we often
work from http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev's tip revision, and
Launchpad hasn't mirrored it yet. So when we go to submit for review,
everything gets royally messed up.

I believe Robert mentioned a while ago that we might be able to change
PQM so that it actually manages "LP" branches. (So after doing the
merge, test, commit it would push to lp:... rather than wherever the
http://bazaar is currently at.)

Of course, we've also recently had lots of failures for PQM trying to
connect to lp: or bzr+ssh:// so maybe it isn't trivial to get it working.

I sort of like not being 100% dependent on LP for getting development
done, though I can't say that I've had any direct problems with the
hosting. (Some stacking issues, but that is because of bzr anyway.)

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpSAk0ACgkQJdeBCYSNAANmTQCgv1yAQReIVlML6lDOOISHYiO8
mYkAnR4o4cSXTTbDXLp3sG6T99eqIXpO
=AZwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----