most authoritative branch for bzr dev?
Martin Pool
mbp at canonical.com
Mon Jul 6 13:51:41 BST 2009
I think we should point first to lp. It may be faster because it has a
smart server, though at the moment only over ssh.
On Jul 5, 2009 8:26 AM, "Vincent Ladeuil"
<v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr<v.ladeuil%2Blp at free.fr>>
wrote:
>>>>> "Maritza" == Maritza Mendez <martitzam at gmail.com> writes:
Maritza> The page http://bazaar-vcs.org/Download is features prominently
in a Google
Maritza> search for 'bzr' and (below the list of packages) directs
visitors to
Maritza> bzr branch http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev and I am using this
for a while
Maritza> to watch development.
Maritza> The content of this branch appears to be kept in sync with
lp:bzr (
Maritza> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr/bzr/trunk/ )
Maritza> Is there a reason the website does not point to lp ?
Maritza> Is one branch more authoritative that the other ?
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr/bzr/trunk/ aka lp:bzr is a
mirror of http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev.
So the authoritative one is http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev,
that's where the patch land first.
Vincent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090706/f02388b1/attachment.htm
More information about the bazaar
mailing list