most authoritative branch for bzr dev?

Martin Pool mbp at canonical.com
Mon Jul 6 13:51:41 BST 2009


I think we should point first to lp.  It may be faster because it has a
smart server, though at the moment only over ssh.

On Jul 5, 2009 8:26 AM, "Vincent Ladeuil"
<v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr<v.ladeuil%2Blp at free.fr>>
wrote:

>>>>> "Maritza" == Maritza Mendez <martitzam at gmail.com> writes:

   Maritza> The page http://bazaar-vcs.org/Download is features prominently
in a Google
   Maritza> search for 'bzr' and (below the list of packages) directs
visitors to

   Maritza> bzr branch http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev and I am using this
for a while
   Maritza> to watch development.

   Maritza> The content of this branch appears to be kept in sync with
lp:bzr  (
   Maritza> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr/bzr/trunk/ )

   Maritza> Is there a reason the website does not point to lp ?
   Maritza> Is one branch more authoritative that the other ?

http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr/bzr/trunk/ aka lp:bzr is a
mirror of http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev.

So the authoritative one is http://bazaar-vcs.org/bzr/bzr.dev,
that's where the patch land first.

  Vincent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090706/f02388b1/attachment.htm 


More information about the bazaar mailing list