Better name for dpush wanted

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Forest Bond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:58:41AM +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>   
>> Did we ever get a better name for dpush (or option to
>> push enabling it) agreed? I'd really like to see that
>> happen before the current name gains any more inertia.
>>
>> FWIW, the best suggestion I'd seen/heard so far is
>> calling it "push-out".
>>     
>
> I'd like to add that projects that use svn exclusively would much prefer bzr
> users to dpush instead of push.  I'd always wondered what dpush did and why I
> had to confuse other users with bzr meta-data conflicts on svn cherry-picks.
> Sadly, I didn't connect those musings.
>   
This is only the case if you're using an old Subversion server (<1.4.x).
Newer versions of bzr-svn use revision properties, which are not
generally visible to the user in e.g. commit notification emails, and
won't cause conflicts in cherry picks.

Cheers,

Jelmer