Better name for dpush wanted

[Forest Bond]

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:58:41AM +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Did we ever get a better name for dpush (or option to
> push enabling it) agreed? I'd really like to see that
> happen before the current name gains any more inertia.
> 
> FWIW, the best suggestion I'd seen/heard so far is
> calling it "push-out".

I'd like to add that projects that use svn exclusively would much prefer bzr
users to dpush instead of push.  I'd always wondered what dpush did and why I
had to confuse other users with bzr meta-data conflicts on svn cherry-picks.
Sadly, I didn't connect those musings.

It'd be swell to somehow make it much more obvious to new bzr-svn users that
they may want to prefer dpush over push.  bzr push is cunningly obvious and
most users will likely never realize that there is another option.

Maybe the first time that users push to a foreign repo they should get an error
indicating that they may want to use dpush instead, but every time after that
bzr just does what it's supposed to do?

Thanks,
Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
http://www.pytagsfs.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090417/dcc77720/attachment.pgp