Better name for dpush wanted

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Jelmer,
> 
> Did we ever get a better name for dpush (or option to
> push enabling it) agreed? I'd really like to see that
> happen before the current name gains any more inertia.
> 
> FWIW, the best suggestion I'd seen/heard so far is
> calling it "push-out".

I still like "push-rebase" for the "you knew the risks" connotation, but
"push-unobtrusive" is perhaps the clearest expression of "push without
upsetting the heathens".

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkno1qMACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI3pVACffvAVYxDQ+WHa44U+FbwSiyd/
fv4AnivW+vL54weUvqJj/gAQut3/b2sy
=9M/W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----