Last day to vote/reject on proposed EOL names

Alexander Belchenko bialix at ukr.net
Tue Mar 31 06:40:35 BST 2009


Eugene Wee пишет:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ben Finney <ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au
> <mailto:ben%2Bbazaar at benfinney.id.au>> wrote:
> 
>     (Assuming that these names should say ‘eol’, not ‘eof’, throughout
>     your message.)
> 
> 
> Good catch :) 
>  
> 
>     The names might be better, though, if it was clear that *neither* of
>     them is the one true EOL setting. One for the working tree, one for
>     the repository: ‘tree-eol’, ‘repo-eol’, perhaps.
> 
> 
> I would be happy with that. However, I think Alexander Belchenko has a
> point: it needs to be made clear that there is no general need to set
> "repo-eol".
> 
> Just to check: "repo-eol" would default to lf; would "tree-eol" default
> to native?

No, default is "exact", because it's only one safe choice.

> 
> Regards,
> Eugene Wee
> 




More information about the bazaar mailing list