Last day to vote/reject on proposed EOL names
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Tue Mar 31 06:40:35 BST 2009
Eugene Wee пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ben Finney <ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au
> <mailto:ben%2Bbazaar at benfinney.id.au>> wrote:
>
> (Assuming that these names should say ‘eol’, not ‘eof’, throughout
> your message.)
>
>
> Good catch :)
>
>
> The names might be better, though, if it was clear that *neither* of
> them is the one true EOL setting. One for the working tree, one for
> the repository: ‘tree-eol’, ‘repo-eol’, perhaps.
>
>
> I would be happy with that. However, I think Alexander Belchenko has a
> point: it needs to be made clear that there is no general need to set
> "repo-eol".
>
> Just to check: "repo-eol" would default to lf; would "tree-eol" default
> to native?
No, default is "exact", because it's only one safe choice.
>
> Regards,
> Eugene Wee
>
More information about the bazaar
mailing list