Last day to vote/reject on proposed EOL names

[Eugene Wee]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ben Finney
<ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au<ben%2Bbazaar at benfinney.id.au>
> wrote:

> (Assuming that these names should say ‘eol’, not ‘eof’, throughout
> your message.)
>

Good catch :)


> The names might be better, though, if it was clear that *neither* of
> them is the one true EOL setting. One for the working tree, one for
> the repository: ‘tree-eol’, ‘repo-eol’, perhaps.
>

I would be happy with that. However, I think Alexander Belchenko has a
point: it needs to be made clear that there is no general need to set
"repo-eol".

Just to check: "repo-eol" would default to lf; would "tree-eol" default to
native?

Regards,
Eugene Wee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090331/1b901f64/attachment.htm