Last day to vote/reject on proposed EOL names

[Alexander Belchenko]

Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> Thanks to everyone for their thoughtful emails on picking
> the right names for our EOL settings. Here's my latest
> thinking - the names will be upwardly compatible with
> those used for svn (except for cr which I'm not planning to add):
> 
> * native
> * lf
> * crlf
> * exact

+1.

> * native:crlf
> * lf:crlf
> * crlf:crlf

In fact I think bzr needs only native:crlf. Other variants is less likely to be used often.

Also I think you should hide xxx:crlf variants somewhere in the end of the eol help,
so newbies won't face with they existence very often, and therefore will avoid confusion.

> 
> In general, wt-format[:repo-format] where the default
> repo-format is lf. I'm happy to change the separator to -, +, / or
> something else but : seems as good as any.
> 
> I'm planning to land EOL support into bzr.dev with those names
> 24 hours from now. If anyone objects, here's your last chance
> to say why.
> 
> Ian C.
> 
>