Recommended use of Bazaar for single-committer multiple-machine projects?

[Matthew D. Fuller]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:49:23PM -0600 I heard the voice of
John Arbash Meinel, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> I believe Robert is opposed to the > idea of "bound branches" [...]

Insofar as that means beating firmly about the head and neck any
utterance of the phrase "bound branch" in referring to "checkout", I
heartily agree.


> I'm not entirely sure which is more simple for users, but I can
> agree that a checkout with "commit --local" is not polished
> sufficiently.

I just don't think it CAN be.  Surely it can have a lot less sharp
edges, but cramming together the concepts of staying in sync and going
out of sync is just too hairy a process to be anything but the
previously mentioned "escape hatch".


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.