RFC: install_revisions -> install_deltas ?

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:22 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> However, if the basis revision is present in the destination object
> >> then the delta must be supplied?  Is it OK to eg pass None as the
> >> basis_revision_id and no delta?
> >
> > Not IMO :>.
> 
> Ok, but say so.  So the basis revision must always be the same as the
> primary parent?  If so, is there any need to separately specify it?

The basis revision is arbitrary; the inventory delta is against that
revision. The basis revision and delta must be supplied; it seems weird
to call out any items as being optional when none of them are.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20081015/e6721e2c/attachment.pgp