display of merged revisions in loggerhead and log

[Martin Pool]

>  > Displaying the branch nick is very good, though I wonder if the
>  > particular way it is shown here may be taken to mean that eg 3221.1.13
>  > of "prepare-1.2" was merged, which will not generally be true.
>
> I don't understand this.  In the screenie I posted
>  (http://people.ubuntu.com/~mwh/hacked_up_changelog_view_3.png) this
>  revision _is_ merged, surely?

The revision is merged, but it may have had a different number in the
branch it came from (typically a mainline number).  That said I cannot
think of a better display for it at the moment.

>  > The 'description' field seems redundant?
>
> Well, the table only contains a short version of the commit message.
>  bzr.dev and pqm being what they are, the full version is probably the
>  same as the short version here, but in general it's not.

'short' meaning that it only displays the first line?  Maybe it'd be
possible to have the rest of the message appear when it's unfolded,
rather than having two fields?

-- 
Martin