"submit" command naming - just "bundle" preferred?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>>>>>> "aaron" == Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> writes:
>     aaron> As you know, PQM doesn't require and can't use a full-blown MIME email.
>     aaron>  So there also needs to be a way to ensure bzr just sends the message
>     aaron> itself, with no editor popup or anything.
> 
> And what about updating pqm so that it can just handle the same
> submissions than BB ?

I started work on that, and then other things came up.

> I think Martin mentioned in this discussion that 'bzr merge
> bundle' was good.

I agree, but why do you mention it?

> If it's good for BB, it's good for PQM :-)

I don't think I agree.  When I submit to PQM, I want it to work like the
pqm-submit plugin works.  I don't want to be prompted to write an email
that only PQM will see.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGoLBy0F+nu1YWqI0RAo+9AJ4pFzTKwEas1zAPHW58U6F1LvgM6ACdFDuz
wOBM3whCM9dUZy0nhjsQf68=
=vlhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----