Bzr bind feature request

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:42 +0100, Nicholas Allen wrote:
> > This has been discussed in the past. Is there a reason you prefer this
> > to just doing 'bzr commit --local' ?
> >   
> Yes. Because I know when I am online or offline and this may happen for 
> reasonably long periods of time. If I am offline for a while I have to 
> keep remembering to pass --local to the commit command. It's much easier 
> to just tell bzr when I go offline and when I come back online again. 
> For example, I know the work server is down for the whole day for 
> maintenance so I just run bzr unbind at the start of the day and when 
> the server comes online again I run bzr bind. It's an added convenience 
> that I do not have to pass the bind location again.
I've thought about writing was a plugin that communicates with
NetworkManager to see whether there is an internet connection and then
makes "bzr commit" local or bound based on whether there is a
connection. 

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20061201/b98ce3f3/attachment.pgp