GPL not a EULA?

[Marius Kruger]

I looked at your screen shots. Some comments:

   1. The info page is good and appropriate, as all good citersens wants
   to know exactly under which licence he is installing the software. People
   and especially companies don't want to be on the wrong side of the law.
   2. If it is possible, I think it would make sense to clarify to the
   user,
   that the license applies to bzr code (like Lachlan said)


On 10/11/06, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
>
>
> Attached bundle change license page to info page. If people will
> satisfied with this change (looking at screenshots) then merge this
> change to bzr.dev for 0.12 release.
>
> --
> Alexander
>

On 10/11/06, Lachlan Patrick <loki at research.canon.com.au> wrote:
>
> Yes, I was thinking the installer could display it and say "This applies
> to bzr code, not your code or documents", and the user just clicks Next.
>


thanks
marius

-- 
--

The source is strong in this one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20061014/3b5c7bb7/attachment.htm