switch to a past revision

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Arbash Meinel wrote:

> I think there is a set of bugs. Both 'bzr log' and 'bzr revno' show the
> full branch history, rather than just the working tree. I think all
> commands that work on the local working tree should use *just* that.

I think this is the kind of problem I was trying to avoid when I argued
for having just one revno per location.

> It does need to be fixed. I suppose it would be possible for 'bzr revno'
> to split, and give both the working tree and the branch revno. But I
> think for simplicity, it should always give only one. (Perhaps a flag to
> give the other one)

If it gives only one, shouldn't it always produce the branch revno?  If
there's a workingtree, there's guaranteed to be a branch, but there's no
guarantee that there's a workingtree if a branch is present.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE0OnP0F+nu1YWqI0RAndhAKCB8YpUmtlQN8twjhbVleuutEFCEQCfSF0m
Fob0SBjkMES44rZkosnhkXI=
=w0ck
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----