auto guess committer email.. good idea?
Martin Pool
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Thu Mar 2 08:22:55 GMT 2006
On 28 Feb 2006, Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2006/2/28, James Blackwell <jblack at merconline.com>:
> > I think that there's four, ordered by the ways I think are easiest for
> > users.
> >
> > 1. Leave it alone.
> > 2. Politely remind user that email address isn't open.
> > 3. Ask for the email address
> > 4. Bomb out if email address isn't set
>
> As a user, I'd order it 2, 4, 3, 1.
There are a few levels of "set" or not - if $MAIL is set, it's probably
a reasonable assumption and doesn't require a warning. If /etc/mailname
is present (giving the machine's mail domain) is that good enough?
Probably so. (Separately - is there any good equivalent accessible from
Python on Windows?)
If none of these and we are just going to use user at hostname with the raw
hostname then a warning shown once per process would be OK with me.
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060302/44334a9b/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list