Is bzr *appropriate* and *ready* for me?

[Matthieu Moy]

Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> writes:

>> The distributed bzr is for something. When it gets support for
>> centralized storage, it may become "all around" SCM.
>
>
> Please explain to me, in which way you think that bzr doesn't support
> centralized storage.  There is no problem pushing and pulling from a
> central storage (the only thing missing is checkouts).

Actually, what's usually referred to a centralized storage in bzr is
something unrelated from this. This is just a compact way to store
sereval branches in the same place:

  http://bazaar.canonical.com/CentralizedStorage

-- 
Matthieu