Is bzr *appropriate* and *ready* for me?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Actually, what's usually referred to a centralized storage in bzr is
> something unrelated from this. This is just a compact way to store
> sereval branches in the same place:

At UBZ, we found it useful to break the concept of centralized
development into two concepts:

1. lock-step development, in which people all work on the same branch
and cannot commit unless they are up to date.  Bound branches and
checkouts address this.

2. centralized storage, in which long-term storage is centralized,
making it cheap and easy to publish a set of branches, making it
possible to ensure that all branches are published, reducing storage
requirements, allowing the working trees of finished/archival branches
to be deleted.  Repositories address this.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD624w0F+nu1YWqI0RAtCTAJ962Z7cvF6mdT2qigUg36eeN21DeACeOkeF
Kr+KSxlHq875T6IcgYLJVKA=
=7HOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----