Centralized Storage, round 2
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Fri Sep 16 15:08:11 BST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Collins wrote:
> Sounds to me that that centralised storage isn't really the key here;
> its having the branches in a central place that you can
> backup/access/merge from.
That's the kind of centralized storage I'd like to see.
> (/home/warthogs/archives/USERNAME/$CATEGORY/[$VERSION/]/$BRANCH). This
> will be inefficient without central storage, but will be easy to use.
It won't be as easy as Arch. Branching will require extra steps.
Managers have a concern about DRCS that it could lead to branches being
lost. They want to be reassured that they'll be able to find everything
without being dependent on a particular programmer. They want a system
where centralization of branches can be on by default.
> our developers currently mirror their archives up, they will be using
> push as the equivalent to 'mirror', and I'll be doing a 'post commit
> hook' to make this happen automatically for those who want that.
That makes sense for a spread-out organization like Canonical, but it's
silly when everyone's on the same LAN.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar