bzr branch is slow and memory-hungry (just a data point)

[Michael Alan Dorman]

"Matthieu MOY" <Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr> writes:
> bzr branch is currently heavily unoptimized (has to copy the whole
> archive, which itself is not space-saving), but this will change. See
> recent threads on this list with "cheap(er)? branching" and "centralized
> storage" as search keywords.

Ah, good point, I had skimmed those threads thinking "cheaper" in
terms of disk storage, not considering that that implies "cheaper" in
terms of construction as well.

Mike
-- 
I've got some groceries, some peanut butter -- Talking Heads