Two little things (Mainly win32 related)

[Roncaglia Julien]

> If you want to prevent people from accidentally adding ignored files,
> that's reasonable.  But don't do it in such a way that people can't
> deliberately add ignored files.

The solution of adding manualy the file without using glob will always
add it.

> In Unix, you can't tell whether a
> filename was produced by wildcard expansion or was the exact text the
> user entered.  So in unix, you can, and must, be able to add unversioned
> files with "bzr add foo.*".  So you'd have differences in behavior
> between win32 and unix.

As said in my answer to John this is mainly a design problem where a
choice will be needed between :
 - Having no difference in behavior between unix and win32
 - Or having difference when needed to be consistent with the OS

> On the other hand, it would be rather strange if "bzr add foo.pyc"
> worked, and "bzr add *.pyc" did not.

The invert is also true, i don't know if "*.*" is used frequently under
unix (i dont think because files without extension are common) but
windows users will (in my opinion) expect thoses two commands to be the
same (Considering that there is no files without extensions inside
some_directory):

bzr add some_directory\
bzr add some_directory\*.*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050609/871af438/attachment.pgp