[apparmor] Where should the new aa-exec live in packaging

[Jamie Strandboge]

On 07/24/2013 11:26 AM, John Johansen wrote:
> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
> which package to put it in.
> 
> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, create
> a new package for binary utils, or just move it into the apparmor_parser
> packaging, and make it part of the default install.
> 
> What are peoples preferences for this
> 
Personally, I think adding it to the apparmor_parser packaging is fine and a lot
less work.

-- 
Jamie Strandboge                 http://www.ubuntu.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20130724/d73315fb/attachment-0001.pgp>