[apparmor] Where should the new aa-exec live in packaging

[John Johansen]

On 07/24/2013 11:02 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 11:26 AM, John Johansen wrote:
>> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
>> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
>> which package to put it in.
>>
>> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, create
>> a new package for binary utils, or just move it into the apparmor_parser
>> packaging, and make it part of the default install.
>>
>> What are peoples preferences for this
>>
> Personally, I think adding it to the apparmor_parser packaging is fine and a lot
> less work.
> 
sure though it does raise a question around libapparmor

currently the parser package does not depend on libapparmor, should we statically
link aa-exec to libapparmor or should we make the parser package depend on libapparmor

btw the parser is going to start using libapparmor too, with the currently patch
that does this statically linking libapparmor to the parser